Risk Solutions for Carriers
All Hong Kong residents are Chinese citizens.
The background to the British offer is the enactment of the law to protect national security in the Chinese Special Administrative Region. The far-reaching and vaguely worded decree from Beijing is directed against separatism, undermining state power, terrorism and "secret agreements" with forces abroad that Beijing regards as hostile to China. The maximum sentence is life imprisonment. It also turns against foreigners and enables extraditions to China.
This is how much a dose costs: politician tweets prices of corona vaccines Without Russian investigators: Public prosecutor questions Alexej Navalny France in concern: Corona-infected Macron is apparently worse off
Police reported that more than 370 people were arrested in Hong Kong during spontaneous, unauthorized protests against the security law on Wednesday. Ten were arrested for violating the new law. It came into effect on Wednesday, the 23rd anniversary of the 1997 return of Hong Kong to China.
To protest against the law, the British government summoned Chinese ambassador Liu Xiaoming to the Foreign Office in London. Foreign Minister Dominic Raab accused the communist leadership in Beijing of using the law to strangle the previously guaranteed freedoms in Hong Kong. "This is a serious and deeply worrying step"said Raab in Parliament in London.
–>
Prime Minister Johnson had reiterated his threat in the face of the new security law to pave the way for former Hong Kong subjects to obtain British citizenship. These are those who have British Overseas Citizenship (BNO) status. Around 350,000 Hong Kong residents have this type of ID. In theory, however, almost three million are entitled to it. Instead of the previous six months, they should be allowed to stay in Great Britain for up to five years in the future – with labor law and the prospect of naturalization.
China’s foreign office spokesman protested: "All Hong Kong compatriots, including those who have passports as British overseas citizens, are Chinese citizens." Before the return of the crown colony, Great Britain had made a clear commitment not to grant them a right of residence. A change in this policy violates international law and basic norms of international relations. "The Chinese side strongly condemns this and reserves the right to further replies."
The new security law had met with sharp criticism in Hong Kong and internationally. China’s state security organs have extensive powers in what is actually the autonomous Chinese special administrative region. Although the seven million Hong Kongers were guaranteed freedom rights and autonomy during the change of sovereignty in 1997, Chinese state security organs will have a free hand in Hong Kong and can investigate on their own.
The British Prime Minister saw one "distinct and serious break" the "Joint statement" with China about the return at the time. The law violates Hong Kong’s autonomy rights and is contrary to the constitution of the special administrative region, said Johnson.
In response, the Australian government is also considering granting special visas to Hong Kong residents who could be jeopardized by the security law. The situation in Hong Kong was "very worrying"said Prime Minister Scott Morrison in Canberra. His government think "very active" about ways to protect Hong Kong residents. In any case, relations between Australia and its most important economic partner China are strained.
Seven police officers were also injured during the protests in Hong Kong on Wednesday. An officer was wounded with a stabbing weapon, the police said. As the "South China Morning Post" reported, the 24-year-old attacker was later arrested on board a plane before leaving for the UK.to kill a mockingbird courage essay introduction
Hong Kong (AP) – In the dispute over China’s planned security law for Hong Kong, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has promised a large part of the population of the Chinese special administrative region that they will be naturalized in Great Britain.
–>
In a personal guest article in the Hong Kong newspaper "South China Morning Post" on Wednesday, Johnson wrote that if China passed the law, Britain would have "no other choice"than to change his immigration law far-reaching.
China sharply criticized the deliberations and threatened them "Countermeasures": All Hong Kong residents are Chinese citizens. The British Prime Minister, however, argued that the security law would restrict the freedoms guaranteed when the British Crown Colony was returned to China in 1997 and undermine autonomy.
"If China moves forward with this, it would be a direct violation of the Joint Declaration, a legally binding treaty registered with the United Nations"said Johnson about the agreement for the return. It says that according to the principle "one country, two systems" the social and economic system in Hong Kong would remain intact – as would the lifestyle and essential rights and freedoms of the seven million Hong Kong people.
The path to naturalization could be paved for the 350,000 British citizens abroad (BNO) passports currently in Hong Kong, to which another 2.5 million would be entitled, said Johnson. Instead of the previous six, they could in future be granted twelve months of residence in Great Britain – with the option of renewal. They should also get a work permit and extended immigration rights, with which they got on the way to citizenship.
–>
The Chinese Foreign Office spokesman Zhao Lijian contradicted Johnson. In the joint declaration, China made a unilateral political commitment, but was "no responsabilities" received on the British side or internationally. Britain should be his "Cold War and Colonial Mentality" lay down. It must also recognize that Hong Kong is now a special administrative region of China and no longer interfere.
In view of the protests in Hong Kong that have been going on since last summer, the People’s Congress in Beijing on Thursday approved the plans for the National Security Protection Act and instructed the Parliament’s Standing Committee to enact it. The law bypasses Hong Kong’s parliament. It is directed against activities that Beijing sees as subversive or separatist. It also opposes foreign interference. The pro-democratic forces in Hong Kong fear that they will be targeted.
Hackers from abroad have apparently attacked IT systems of the Australian government and important companies. The Prime Minister probably suspects China is behind it.
According to information from insiders, Australia suspects China behind a large-scale hacker attack on the government and operators of critical infrastructures. They are very convinced that China is behind the attacks, it said on Friday in Australian government circles.
The Chinese embassy in Canberra did not initially provide any response. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had previously stated that a tech-savvy attacker had tried for months to hack all levels of government, political institutions, key service providers and the operators of critical infrastructure. The type and scope of the attack suggested that it was a state-supported actor.
According to the Australian secret services, the latest attacks are similar to the cyber attack on parliament and the three largest parties in March 2019. China was also blamed for this. However, Australia did not officially name any culprit. China denied responsibility for the attacks.
Defense Secretary Linda Reynolds does not expect any major data leak in the recent attacks. Nevertheless, she urged Internet users to bring their software up to date.
–>
Because of the range and nature of the goals and the techniques used, it is clear that a "sophisticated state cyber actor" behind the attacks, said Morrison on Friday.
Australian organizations are affected in a number of areas, including all levels of government, industry, political organizations, education, health and critical infrastructure providers. However, initial investigations have so far not revealed any major breaches of personal data. "Unfortunately, this activity is not new. The frequency has increased"said Morrison.
Australian security agencies worked closely with allies to address the problem, particularly with partners in the "Five Eyes" called the secret service alliance, so Morrison. In addition to Australia, this includes the USA, Great Britain, Canada and New Zealand. Morrison said he had spoken to his British counterpart Boris Johnson about the cyberattacks on Thursday evening.
At traffic control: New Zealand: Unarmed policeman shot dead on the street. Unknown person: Unknown person climbs on the Reichstag building
In the past, Australia, like other western states, has accused China of being behind large-scale cyberattacks. Morrison did not name a country but said: "There aren’t too many state actors who have these skills."
Sources used: dpa news agency Reuters news agency–>
The dispute with China apparently continues to escalate. Now the US is targeting representatives of the country’s Communist Party – and imposing visa restrictions.
In the dispute over Hong Kong’s autonomy, the US is imposing visa restrictions on leading members of the Chinese Communist Party. The measure is directed against former and current party representatives who participate in the "Undermining" of Hong Kong’s autonomy are involved, said US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Friday. The minister did not provide any information on who exactly the punitive measures would take.
"President Trump has promised to punish the Chinese Communist Party officials responsible for undermining Hong Kong’s freedoms"explained Pompeo. "Today we are taking steps to do just that."
Critics in Beijing have long accused the government of undermining the autonomy of the Chinese Special Administrative Region. A planned Chinese security law for Hong Kong is currently causing sharp criticism.
Campaign appearance in Arizona: Trump visits his wall on the border with Mexico "Propaganda facilities": USA tighten control of Chinese state media Vortex over disclosure book: Trump wants to deny Bolton profits from the book
According to Western states, the law represents a massive encroachment on the semi-autonomous status of Hong Kong and endangers democratic civil rights. Among other things, the law allows Chinese security forces to work in the former British crown colony.
Sources used: dpa news agency–>
Berlin (dpa) – Tens of millions of people have already been infected by the corona virus that appeared about half a year ago – has it mutated in the meantime and is becoming more dangerous?
New US study: Do corona residues get into human genome? Epidemiologist on corona vaccine: "It is normal for there to be gaps in knowledge at the time of admission" Study compares diseases: Covid-19 is probably three times as deadly as flu Telephone calls and game evenings: Maintaining contacts in a store or bar in lockdown ?: Corona risk of infection – it is increased here
In a preprint publication that has not yet been reviewed, researchers at the American Scripps Research Institute conclude from genome analyzes that a mutation called D614G makes the virus more infectious. The team recently reported that the pathogen could infect more cells under laboratory conditions.
Coincidences play a big role
–>
The D614G mutation is actually strongly present in the virus strains circulating in Europe and on the east coast of the USA, explains Richard Neher from the University of Basel. "From this dominance, however, it cannot be concluded that the virus with the mutation spreads faster." The dominance is not necessarily due to a higher transmission rate or virulence, but rather a coincidence, explains the head of the research group Evolution of Viruses and Bacteria: The D614G virus variant was at the beginning of individual larger outbreaks and subsequently spread more than other variants. "Coincidences play an incredibly important role, especially at the beginning."
In general, mutations in the coronavirus are absolutely not uncommon, emphasizes Neher. In its 30,000 bases, a mutation occurs on average every two weeks. This means that the mutation rate per base is slightly lower than for example with influenza or HIV, but because of the larger genome of Sars-CoV-2, the value is ultimately about the same. Based on the mutations, one can conclude whether two outbreaks are related – chains of infection from person to person cannot be traced.